
Typical applications for piezometers are:
The vibrating wire piezometer is the most commonly deployed piezometer and is suitable for almost all applications. It consists of a vibrating wire pressure transducer and signal cable. It can be installed in a borehole, embedded in fill, or suspended in a standpipe. Readings are obtained with a portable readout or a data logger.
Advantages:
Easy to read, very accurate; good response time in all soils; easy to automate; reliable remote readings.
Limitations:
Must be protected from electrical transients.
The pneumatic piezometer operates by gas pressure. It consists of a pneumatic pressure transducer and pneumatic tubing. It can be installed in a borehole, embedded in fill, or suspended in a standpipe. Readings are obtained with a pneumatic indicator.
Advantages:
Reliable, remote reading possible, not electrical, indicator can be calibrated at any time.
Limitations:
Accuracy depends on skill of operator; difficult and expensive to automate, so reading requires man on site; reading time increases with length of tubing; pneumatic tubing can be blocked by condensation if not frequently charged with dry nitrogen gas.
The standpipe piezometer is the most basic of piezometer types. It consists of a filter tip joined to a riser pipe. Water flow from the surrounding soil into the standpipe. Readings are obtained with a water level indicator.
Advantages:
Yesple, reliable, not electrical, no calibrated components.
Limitations:
Accuracy depends on skill of operator; reading requires a man on site; remote reading not possible; slower to show changes in pore-water pressure.
| Comparison of Piezometers | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Standpipe | Pneumatic | Vibrating Wire | |
| Response | Slow | Fast | Fast |
| Precision | High | Medium | High |
| Automation | Impossible | Difficult | Yesple |
| Connect to Data Logger | No | No | Yes |
| Potential for Lightning Damage | No | No | Yes |